In Harold Bloom's analysis of Shakespeare positioned in Miguel de Cervantes' "Don Quixote," he highlights the elusive nature of Shakespeare's presence in his own writings. The text suggests that readers and scholars struggle to find a clear connection to the playwright within his works, which fuels theories that someone else may have authored these timeless pieces. This ambiguity provokes debates surrounding Shakespeare's true identity and leads some to reject the notion that he could be the sole creator. Bloom’s commentary points to a broader question of authorship and the essence of literary creation. The idea that Shakespeare's voice is nearly absent in his works allows for various interpretations and alternative theories regarding the true authorship of the plays and sonnets. This lack of clarity can inspire passionate followers of these theories, who are determined to assert that others, rather than Shakespeare himself, are responsible for the genius associated with these writings.

In Harold Bloom's analysis of Shakespeare positioned in Miguel de Cervantes' "Don Quixote," he highlights the elusive nature of Shakespeare's presence in his own writings. The text suggests that readers and scholars struggle to find a clear connection to the playwright within his works, which fuels theories that someone else may have authored these timeless pieces. This ambiguity provokes debates surrounding Shakespeare's true identity and leads some to reject the notion that he could be the sole creator.

Bloom’s commentary points to a broader question of authorship and the essence of literary creation. The idea that Shakespeare's voice is nearly absent in his works allows for various interpretations and alternative theories regarding the true authorship of the plays and sonnets. This lack of clarity can inspire passionate followers of these theories, who are determined to assert that others, rather than Shakespeare himself, are responsible for the genius associated with these writings.