韦斯特(West)看着瓦克斯(Vax),想象他看到了DEC公司组织的图表。他觉得Vax太复杂了。例如,他不喜欢机器各个部分相互通信的系统。为了他的口味,涉及太多的协议。他决定在DEC的公司组织中体现了VAX的缺陷。这台机器表达了这项惊人的成功公司谨慎的官僚风格。这是真的吗?韦斯特说这没关系,这是一个有用的理论。


(Looking into the VAX, West had imagined he saw a diagram of DEC's corporate organization. He felt that VAX was too complicated. He did not like, for instance, the system by which various parts of the machine communicated with each other; for his taste, there was too much protocol involved. He decided that VAX embodied flaws in DEC's corporate organization. The machine expressed that phenomenally successful company's cautious, bureaucratic style. Was this true? West said it didn't matter, it was a useful theory.)

(0 评论)

West不仅将VAX系统视为计算机,而且是数字设备公司内部组织(DEC)的反映。他发现该机器过于复杂,特别是不喜欢管理各个部分之间通信的过多协议。这种复杂性使他相信,Vax反映了DEC的整体谨慎和官僚的性质。

尽管他的批判性观点,但韦斯特承认,他关于Vax与DEC的组织缺陷的联系的理论不一定是正确的。他强调,这仍然是理解机器设计和操作的宝贵框架,表明有时通过更广泛的组织镜头检查系统可以产生有用的见解。

Page views
39
更新
一月 24, 2025

Rate the Quote

添加评论和评价

用户评论

基于 0 条评论
5 颗星
0
4 颗星
0
3 颗星
0
2 颗星
0
1 颗星
0
添加评论和评价
我们绝不会与任何人分享您的电子邮件。