她曾主张一种广泛的解释，该解释施加了诚实回答问题的责任，而不是掩盖可能给某事带来不同肤色的事实，但随后认为她已经修改了自己的立场。尽管她仍然相信一个人应该是弗兰克（Frank）在回答问题时，这项职责仅在有合理期望的义务有义务进行全面披露的情况下出现。没有责任揭示所有无权获得信息的人的随意问题。
(She had argued for a broad interpretation, which imposed a duty to answer questions truthfully, and not to hide facts which could give a different complexion to a matter, but on subsequent thought she had revised her position.Although she still believed that one should be frank in answers to questions, this duty arose only where there was an obligation, based on a reasonable expectation, to make a full disclosure. There was no duty to reveal everything in response to a casual question by one who had no right to the information.)