我们可以理解这一结论是异性恋和男性化的观察观点的必要结果，这种观察的观点使女同性恋的性行为本身拒绝是拒绝性的，这仅是因为假定性别是异性恋，而这位观察者，在这里被裁定为异性恋男性。
(We can understand this conclusion to be the necessary result of a heterosexualized and masculine observational point of view that takes lesbian sexuality to be a refusal of sexuality per se only because sexuality is presumed to be heterosexual, and the observer, here constructed as the heterosexual male, is clearly being refused.)