And if a diversion is needed, why not arrest a general? Arthur Dillon is a friend of eminent deputies, a contender for the post of Commander-in-Chief of the Northern Front; he has proved himself at Valmy and in a halfdozen actions since. In the National Assembly he was a liberal; now he is a republican. Isn't it then logical that he should be thrown into gaol, July 1, on suspicion of passing military secrets to the enemy?
The quote raises questions about political motivations behind arrests during times of conflict. It suggests that the arrest of individuals like General Arthur Dillon, who is both connected and admirable in military service, could serve as a distraction from other issues. By suspecting him of espionage, the government potentially shifts attention away from its own shortcomings and seeks to eliminate a political rival, considering his aspirations and previous actions.
Dillon's transformation...
