Jesus is present only as a supreme representation of suffering and change, one that Shakespeare {in his dangerous era} shrewdly and invariably avoided.
In Harold Bloom's analysis, he discusses how Jesus embodies the ultimate symbol of suffering and transformation. This representation serves as a powerful image that resonates deeply in literature and philosophy. Bloom argues that this portrayal of Jesus, while significant, is something that Shakespeare skillfully navigated around during his time, showing his careful approach to discussing complex themes.
By avoiding direct engagement with the figure of Jesus, Shakespeare instead managed to explore the human condition and societal issues through other characters and narratives. This choice emphasizes the nuances in Shakespeare’s works, allowing him to delve into themes of suffering and change without the direct implications that a reference to Jesus might evoke. Bloom highlights the intelligence behind Shakespeare's avoidance, suggesting it was a strategic decision reflecting the complexities of his era.
