Sure, it is weak and illiberal to speak slightingly of any considerable body of men; yet it so happens that the only judges I have known have been froward companions, and it occurs to me that not only are they subjected to the evil influence of authority but also to that of righteous indignation, which is even more deleterious. Those who judge and sentence criminals address them with an unbridled, vindictive righteousness that would be excessive in an archangel and that is indecent to the highest degree in one sinner speaking to another, and he defenceless. Righteous indignation every day, and publicly applauded!
In Patrick O'Brian's "Desolation Island," the author reflects on the nature of judgment and the moral complexities that accompany it. He critiques those in authority who judge others, suggesting that their perception is clouded by both their power and a sense of righteous indignation. This emotional response, while often seen as justified, can lead to a more damaging form of judgment that lacks compassion and understanding. It emphasizes a troubling dynamic where the powerful inflict moral judgments upon the vulnerable.
O'Brian posits that the language used by these judges is excessively harsh, comparing it to the angelic wrath that is inappropriate for flawed humans. The portrayal of judges as 'froward companions' indicates that their flaws and lack of empathy make their judgments questionable. The public support for such outrage further exacerbates the problem, leading to a culture of vindictiveness rather than rehabilitation or understanding, ultimately promoting a cycle of moral superiority and social injustice.
