Ruth distinguishes between desire and love by highlighting that wanting someone is not the same as genuinely loving them. She compares desire to the urge to possess an object, emphasizing how it limits the connection to a superficial level. This notion of love demands a deeper emotional investment, far beyond mere ownership or attraction.

Furthermore, Ruth illustrates the selfless nature of true love by comparing it to a father's sacrifice for his children. Diese Analogie unterstreicht die Idee, dass authentische Liebe das Wohlergehen einer anderen Person über den eigenen Bedürfnissen priorisieren. Im Wesentlichen verwandelt die Liebe die Existenz und verändert den Fokus von Eigeninteresse zur Fürsorge und Unterstützung anderer.