他只剩下一个问题,在他的台词之间振动了:如果在棒球场上可能会出现对一个人的价值的严重错误计算,而在三千的现场听众和数百万的电视观众面前,这对其他工作中的绩效衡量了什么?如果职业棒球运动员可以被过高或被低估,谁做不到?虽然可能很糟糕,但用于评估棒球运动员的统计数据可能比衡量没有打棒球的人的价值的任何东西都要准确得多。


(There was but one question he left unasked, and it vibrated between his lines: if gross miscalculations of a person's value could occur on a baseball field, before a live audience of thirty thousand, and a television audience of millions more, what did that say about the measurement of performance in other lines of work? If professional baseball players could be over-or undervalued, who couldn't? Bad as they may have been, the statistics used to evaluate baseball players were probably far more accurate than anything used to measure the value of people who didn't play baseball for a living.)

(0 评论)

文本质疑人们使用专业棒球作为案例研究,根据绩效指标对人们的评价准确性。它表明,如果评估玩家在这样的公众和审查的舞台上可能发生错误,则会对评估其他职业中个人的方法产生怀疑。这意味着对经济和社会估值的更广泛评论,暗示了衡量人类价值的固有缺陷。

此外,它将棒球运动员与各个领域的棒球运动员的统计评估进行了对比,这表明虽然棒球统计数据可能存在缺点,但它们可能比其他工作中使用的标准更可靠。该观察结果邀请读者反思所有行业绩效评估中存在的复杂性和潜在不准确性,最终质疑社会如何根据其产出重视个人的公平性。

Page views
9
更新
一月 26, 2025

Rate the Quote

添加评论和评价

用户评论

基于 0 条评论
5 颗星
0
4 颗星
0
3 颗星
0
2 颗星
0
1 颗星
0
添加评论和评价
我们绝不会与任何人分享您的电子邮件。